Patriotism vs Nationalism and the "woke right".

The "woke right," and I don't particularly like that term, has been trying to redefine what it means to be America first. They have taken it to the extreme and have equated it with isolationism. That was never Trump's intention, nor was it ever the intention of the Founding Fathers. America first was never meant to be America only. America has always engaged in foreign diplomacy and international cooperation. We have never been an island unto ourselves, and it's impossible in this day and age anyway. With modern technology, the world is much smaller than it used to be. What happens on the other side of the world can and does affect us. It is therefore sometimes in America's best interests to align with other nations. That does not mean we put their interests before ours; it only means that we have mutual interests that benefit both parties.
What I believe is fueling this isolationist view on the woke right is ultranationalism. This is what we saw in Japan and in Germany prior to World War 2. Some of the earmarks of ultranationalism are national superiority, xenophobia, scapegoating minorities/immigrants, fear propaganda, racism, and rejection of international cooperation. Does that not fit the woke right? Unfortunately, they validate everything the left mischaracterizes about MAGA. In actuality, they are not MAGA. They are more aligned with the left with their identity politics and disdain for Israel.
I'm very pro-American, but unlike the woke right, I'm not a nationalist. I identify as a patriot, the same as the Founding Fathers (the term had not even been invented yet). Patriotism and nationalism are often used interchangeably, but there is a difference between them. George Orwell puts it best: 
Nationalism is not to be confused with patriotism. Both words are normally used in so vague a way that any definition is liable to be challenged, but one must draw a distinction between them, since two different and even opposing ideas are involved.  By "patriotism" I mean devotion to a particular place and a particular way of life, which one believes to be the best in the world but has no wish to force on other people.  Patriotism is of its nature defensive, both militarily and culturally. Nationalism, on the other hand, is inseparable from the desire for power.  
The abiding purpose of every nationalist is to secure more power and more prestige, not for himself but for the nation or other unit in which he has chosen to sink his own individuality.
And that is the difference between patriot MAGA and the nationalist woke right.

Popular posts from this blog

A Brief History of Islam: Part 2 Christendom Strikes Back

Image
In less than 80 years, Islam expanded from the Arabian Peninsula to encompass nearly all the Middle and Near East and all of North Africa. On the 30th of April 711, Muslim troops under the command of Tariq ibn Ziyad crossed the Straights of Gibraltar and landed on mainland Europe for the first time. The invasion took everyone in Spain completely by surprise. Within 8 short years the Muslims had occupied most of Spain. As part of their subjugation, the Spanish were forced to hand over 100 white virgins a year to the Muslims be used in their harems. The first Muslim invasion of Sicily took place in 652 but failed, as did repeated attempts in 667 and 720. Between failed attempts and a civil war among the Muslims, it took them 70 years to finally succeed. After the fall of Sicily, they crossed into Southern Italy. Rome was pillaged twice, and the Pope was forced to pay a huge tribute. Several major Mediterranean islands were also conquered, including Cyprus, Rhodes, Sardinia, Majorca...
Read more

Thoughts on the Declaration of Independence and Slavery

It may seem odd at first that the Declaration of Independence doesn't address the issue of slavery. The left, of course, uses this as an opportunity to attack it. How could all men be created equal while slavery still existed? However, the issue was not so cut and dry. Slavery was ingrained into every culture on earth, and ending slavery wasn't something that could be changed in one night, the Civil War proved that. First, a little background. We inherited our slavery from the British, and King George III opposed anti-slavery laws. In 1774 he vetoed every anti-slave law in America. This caused Thomas Jefferson to condemn slavery directly in the first draft of the Declaration of Independence: He has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating its most sacred rights of life and liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating and carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere, or to incur miserable death in their transporta...
Read more

Thoughts on veganism\vegetarians

You know, I don't really care what other people eat. I have a crazy idea that people should be free to eat what they want. If someone wants to eat meat or not that's up to them. I'm not interested in debating which is healthier. What I'm here to talk about is the vegans and vegetarians who want to shame anyone who eats meat.  I'm aware not all vegans/vegetarians are this way, and this is not directed toward them.What I'm talking about are the radical vegans & vegetarians who display an unearned morally superiority against anyone who doesn't eat like them. This extreme form of veganism\vegetarianism is more than a diet, it's an ideology. The main selling point of the radically veggies is that they are more ethical by eating only vegetables. Okay, let's think about this. Ethics is defined as a set of moral principles, especially ones relating to or affirming a specified group, field, or form of conduct.  When you ascribe something as ethical, yo...
Read more