The narrative war on ICE

There are a couple of things driving the narrative war on ICE in Minnesota. One is the exposure of the Somali fraud. There has been hundreds of millions confirmed, and up to one billion alleged, that have been linked to Somali fraud. Such massive fraud could not have been accomplished without a lot of high-level people knowing about it and turning a blind eye. The recent incidents involving Renee Good and Alex Pretti provide a convenient distraction, shifting attention away from the corrupt officials and toward ICE, Trump, and the federal government.

The second thing is about votes. Minnesota, and I'd wager most deep blue cities and states, are dependent on illegals and fraudulent activities in order to win elections. This is how they stay in perpetual power. Trump's crackdown on illegals and fraud jeopardizes their well-oiled fraud machine. That is something they simply cannot allow. This is why you see ex-presidents, politicians, the media, and celebrities coming out of the woodworks and voicing their disapproval of ICE and Trump. All their assets are being deployed.

At its core, everything is about the midterms. This is a very important election for both Republicans and Democrats. If the Republicans win, Trump will go after them unrestrained, and they know it. That is not something they could afford at this juncture. And if the Democrats win, it will hamstring Trump for the next two years, turning him into a lame duck president. Needless to say, there is a lot at stake here. Expect for things to intensify and spread, especially during the summer and leading up to the midterms.

What is happening offers a peek behind the curtains. Everything is about optics and narrative seeding. It's political theater to manipulate the masses who are both spectators and participants in this power struggle. The powers that be want to remain in power, and they require the masses to do it. They use these events as flashpoints for political gain so that they can craft narratives around them and sway the public.

Popular posts from this blog

A Brief History of Islam: Part 2 Christendom Strikes Back

Image
In less than 80 years, Islam expanded from the Arabian Peninsula to encompass nearly all the Middle and Near East and all of North Africa. On the 30th of April 711, Muslim troops under the command of Tariq ibn Ziyad crossed the Straights of Gibraltar and landed on mainland Europe for the first time. The invasion took everyone in Spain completely by surprise. Within 8 short years the Muslims had occupied most of Spain. As part of their subjugation, the Spanish were forced to hand over 100 white virgins a year to the Muslims be used in their harems. The first Muslim invasion of Sicily took place in 652 but failed, as did repeated attempts in 667 and 720. Between failed attempts and a civil war among the Muslims, it took them 70 years to finally succeed. After the fall of Sicily, they crossed into Southern Italy. Rome was pillaged twice, and the Pope was forced to pay a huge tribute. Several major Mediterranean islands were also conquered, including Cyprus, Rhodes, Sardinia, Majorca...
Read more

Thoughts on the Declaration of Independence and Slavery

It may seem odd at first that the Declaration of Independence doesn't address the issue of slavery. The left, of course, uses this as an opportunity to attack it. How could all men be created equal while slavery still existed? However, the issue was not so cut and dry. Slavery was ingrained into every culture on earth, and ending slavery wasn't something that could be changed in one night, the Civil War proved that. First, a little background. We inherited our slavery from the British, and King George III opposed anti-slavery laws. In 1774 he vetoed every anti-slave law in America. This caused Thomas Jefferson to condemn slavery directly in the first draft of the Declaration of Independence: He has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating its most sacred rights of life and liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating and carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere, or to incur miserable death in their transporta...
Read more

Thoughts on veganism\vegetarians

You know, I don't really care what other people eat. I have a crazy idea that people should be free to eat what they want. If someone wants to eat meat or not that's up to them. I'm not interested in debating which is healthier. What I'm here to talk about is the vegans and vegetarians who want to shame anyone who eats meat.  I'm aware not all vegans/vegetarians are this way, and this is not directed toward them.What I'm talking about are the radical vegans & vegetarians who display an unearned morally superiority against anyone who doesn't eat like them. This extreme form of veganism\vegetarianism is more than a diet, it's an ideology. The main selling point of the radically veggies is that they are more ethical by eating only vegetables. Okay, let's think about this. Ethics is defined as a set of moral principles, especially ones relating to or affirming a specified group, field, or form of conduct.  When you ascribe something as ethical, yo...
Read more